Oooh, two posts in one day!
Yesterday, the results of the
New Hampshire primaries were released. The winners were John McCain for the Republicans and Hillary Clinton for the Democrats.
I tend to vote Democrat. I am at heart an anarchist, and I get pretty pissed at anyone that tries to tell me how I should be living and worshipping. At least with Dems I feel I can be myself and not worry about a lynch mob showing up in my yard one day. And yes, I know there are other political parties in this country, but let’s face it – we are pretty much stuck with the lesser of two evils when it comes to politicians.
Anyway, when it comes to policy, I don’t really care for Clinton’s stand on a lot of different issues. I think it’s awesome that she’s running for president, but I’m not going to make my decision based on gender, race, religion, etc. I want to know that our next president will be able to restore our rights and make friends with the rest of the world again.
I would hope that the rest of this country would also make their votes based on how their candidate addresses issues that concern them. I would hope that, as a country, we are able to see past gender and race, and be able to truly focus on what’s important to all of us, not just the top ten percent of rich fat cats. I would hope that we would be happy to see a human side to any and all candidates and not instantly assumed it was staged.
You see, the night before the primaries in New Hampshire, Clinton got a little emotional. It happens. Immediately, every right-wing conservative that could get to a blog or a news outlet accused her of setting it up, staging her tears, acting her way through a meeting. After the final results of the primaries came out, the accusations got worse. Oh, she acted like she really cared, just so she could win. Oh, she’s playing on people’s feelings, pretending like she’s really human, just like everyone else. And according to some, it’s the only reason she won the primaries.
Why? Because she’s a woman?
For the first time in a very long time, I feel compelled to say something about treating someone differently because of gender. So she got a little teary-eyed. So what? She’s certainly not the first candidate to get a little emotional during their campaign, but I do believe she may be the first to be accused of attempting to garner sympathy that way. Is it because people think she’s so cold? Or is she supposed to be stronger than anyone else?
Funny thing about strong women – they are often personified as “bitches,” “ball-busters,” and yes, even cold. It’s ok for a guy to be strong and show little emotion in the face of a stressful situation, but a woman – well, there’s something wrong with her if she’s strong with little emotion. But then, if she breaks down into tears, she’s weak. So which is it?
What made me even angrier was a post I saw from another Pagan woman saying that Clinton must have been acting and that was how she won the New Hampshire primaries. It’s not that I think all Pagan women should be supporting Clinton, but don’t you think we should at least be giving her the benefit of the doubt? Pagan women are supposed to be strong women. I know I’ve been accused of being cold and harsh, and I know what it’s like to stand in the spotlight and have people say horrible things about me. So if another woman comes under attack for being human, I have to come to her defense.
Here’s a
great article by Erica Jong about Clinton and the N. H. primaries. I thought it was a good observation of the whole thing. I invite you to read it, think about it, and truly look into your soul and decide if sexism will be a factor in this presidential election and how much it affects your own decisions. Not just for president, but in all aspects of your life.